Research Synthesis Methods

Table of Contents

Volume 7 Issue 1 (March 2016)

1-107

Issue Information ‐ Title Page

Issue Information ‐ Title page

  • Author:
  • Pub Online: Mar 03, 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1168 (p 1-1)

Issue Information ‐ Info Page

Issue Information ‐ Info page

  • Author:
  • Pub Online: Mar 03, 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1169 (p 2-2)

Issue Information ‐ TOC

Issue Information ‐ TOC

  • Author:
  • Pub Online: Mar 03, 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1170 (p 3-3)

Editorial

2016 Bulletin

  • Author: Hannah Rothstein, Christopher Schmid, Ian Shrier
  • Pub Online: Dec 28, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1189 (p 5-5)

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons

  • Author: Hwanhee Hong, Haitao Chu, Jing Zhang, Bradley P. Carlin
  • Pub Online: Nov 04, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1153 (p 6-22)

Commentaries

Absolute or relative effects? Arm‐based synthesis of trial data

  • Author: S. Dias, A. E. Ades
  • Pub Online: Oct 13, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1184 (p 23-28)

Rejoinder to the discussion of “a Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons,” by S. Dias and A. E. Ades

  • Author: Hwanhee Hong, Haitao Chu, Jing Zhang, Bradley P. Carlin
  • Pub Online: Oct 13, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1186 (p 29-33)

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar

  • Author: Paul Levay, Nicola Ainsworth, Rachel Kettle, Antony Morgan
  • Pub Online: Jul 03, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1158 (p 34-45)

Randomization methods in emergency setting trials: a descriptive review

  • Author: Mark Stephen Corbett, Thirimon Moe‐Byrne, Sam Oddie, William McGuire
  • Pub Online: Sep 02, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1163 (p 46-54)

Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis

  • Author: Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Dan Jackson, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Ralf Bender, Jack Bowden, Guido Knapp, Oliver Kuss, Julian PT Higgins, Dean Langan, Georgia Salanti
  • Pub Online: Sep 02, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1164 (p 55-79)

Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis

  • Author: Gert Valkenhoef, Sofia Dias, A. E. Ades, Nicky J. Welton
  • Pub Online: Oct 13, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1167 (p 80-93)

Software Review

Automated drawing of network plots in network meta‐analysis

  • Author: Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer
  • Pub Online: Jun 09, 2015
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1143 (p 94-107)

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.