Quality and Reliability Engineering International

On Phase II SPC in Cases When Normality is Invalid

Journal Article

Conventional statistical process control (SPC) charts require the normality assumption on the process response distribution. In reality, this assumption is often invalid. In such cases, it has been well demonstrated in the literature that results from control charts using the normality assumption may not be reliable in the sense that their actual false alarm rates could be substantially larger or smaller than the assumed false alarm rate. In this paper, we explore one natural solution to the phase II SPC problem in cases when the normality assumption is invalid, which tries to define a transformation based on an in‐control dataset, so that the transformed process response distribution is close to normal, and thus, the conventional SPC charts can be applied to the transformed phase II data. This approach is compared with several alternative approaches in the literature, and some practical guidelines are provided regarding the use of all relevant control charts. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer


This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.