Bounds on causal interactions for binary outcomes

Journal Article


A common goal of epidemiologic research is to study how two exposures interact in causing a binary outcome. Causal interaction is defined as the presence of subjects for which the causal effect of one exposure depends on the level of the other exposure. For binary exposures, it has previously been shown that the presence of causal interaction is testable through additive statistical interaction. However, it has also been shown that the magnitude of causal interaction, defined as the proportion of subjects for which there is causal interaction, is generally not identifiable. In this article, we derive bounds on causal interactions, which are applicable to binary outcomes and categorical exposures with arbitrarily many levels. These bounds can be used to assess the magnitude of causal interaction, and serve as an important complement to the statistical test that is frequently employed. The bounds are derived both without and with an assumption about monotone exposure effects. We present an application of the bounds to a study of gene–gene interaction in rheumatoid arthritis.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer


This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.