Research Synthesis Methods

Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta‐analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009

Journal Article

  • Author(s): Issa J. Dahabreh, Mei Chung, Georgios D. Kitsios, Teruhiko Terasawa, Gowri Raman, Athina Tatsioni, Annette Tobar, Joseph Lau, Thomas A. Trikalinos, Christopher H. Schmid
  • Article first published online: 26 Jul 2013
  • DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1083
  • Read on Online Library
  • Subscribe to Journal

We performed a survey of meta‐analyses of test performance to describe the evolution in their methods and reporting. Studies were identified through MEDLINE (1966–2009), reference lists, and relevant reviews. We extracted information on clinical topics, literature review methods, quality assessment, and statistical analyses. We reviewed 760 publications reporting meta‐analyses of test performance, published between 1987 and 2009. Eligible reviews included a median of 18 primary studies that were used in quantitative analyses. Most common clinical areas were cardiovascular disease (21%) and oncology (25%); most common test categories were imaging (44%) and biomarker tests (28%). Assessment of verification and spectrum bias, blinding, prospective study design, and consecutive patient recruitment became more common over time (p < 0.001 comparing reviews published through 2004 vs 2005 onwards). These changes coincided with the increasing use of checklists to guide assessment of methodological quality. Heterogeneity tests were used in 58% of meta‐analyses; subgroup or regression analyses were used in 57%. Random effects models were employed in 57% of meta‐analyses (38% through 2004 vs 72% 2004–onwards; p < 0.001). Use of bivariate models of sensitivity and specificity increased in recent years (21% in 2008–2009 vs 7% in earlier years; p < 0.001). Methods employed in meta‐analyses of test performance have improved with the introduction of quality assessment checklists and the development of more sophisticated statistical methods. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.