Statistics in Medicine

The impact of time‐dependent bias in proportional hazards modelling

Journal Article

Abstract

In the clinical literature, time‐dependent exposure status has regularly been analysed as if known at time origin. Although statisticians agree that such an analysis yields biased results when analysing the effect on the time until some endpoint of interest, this paper is the first to study in detail the bias arising in a proportional hazards analysis. We show that the biased hazard ratio estimate will always be less than the unbiased one; this leads to either an inflated or a damped effect of exposure, depending on the sign of the correct log hazard ratio estimate. We find an explicit formula of the asymptotic bias based on generalized rank estimators, and we investigate the role of censoring, which may prevent an individual from being considered as being baseline exposed in the biased analysis. We illustrate our results with data on hospital infection status and different censoring patterns. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.