Research Synthesis Methods

Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta‐analysis

Journal Article

Abstract

The presence of outliers and influential cases may affect the validity and robustness of the conclusions from a meta‐analysis. While researchers generally agree that it is necessary to examine outlier and influential case diagnostics when conducting a meta‐analysis, limited studies have addressed how to obtain such diagnostic measures in the context of a meta‐analysis. The present paper extends standard diagnostic procedures developed for linear regression analyses to the meta‐analytic fixed‐ and random/mixed‐effects models. Three examples are used to illustrate the usefulness of these procedures in various research settings. Issues related to these diagnostic procedures in meta‐analysis are also discussed. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.