Research Synthesis Methods

Using network meta‐analysis to evaluate the existence of small‐study effects in a network of interventions

Journal Article

Suggested methods for exploring the presence of small‐study effects in a meta‐analysis and the possibility of publication bias are associated with important limitations. When a meta‐analysis comprises only a few studies, funnel plots are difficult to interpret, and regression‐based approaches to test and account for small‐study effects have low power. Assuming that the cause of funnel plot asymmetry is likely to affect an entire research field rather than only a particular comparison of interventions, we suggest that network meta‐regression is employed to account for small‐study effects in a set of related meta‐analyses. We present several possible models for the direction and distribution of small‐study effects and we describe the methods by re‐analysing two published networks. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.