Biometrics

A Broad Symmetry Criterion for Nonparametric Validity of Parametrically Based Tests in Randomized Trials

Journal Article

  • Author(s): Russell T. Shinohara, Constantine E. Frangakis, Constantine G. Lyketsos
  • Article first published online: 15 Jul 2011
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01642.x
  • Read on Online Library
  • Subscribe to Journal

Summary Pilot phases of a randomized clinical trial often suggest that a parametric model may be an accurate description of the trial’s longitudinal trajectories. However, parametric models are often not used for fear that they may invalidate tests of null hypotheses of equality between the experimental groups. Existing work has shown that when, for some types of data, certain parametric models are used, the validity for testing the null is preserved even if the parametric models are incorrect. Here, we provide a broader and easier to check characterization of parametric models that can be used to (i) preserve nonparametric validity of testing the null hypothesis, i.e., even when the models are incorrect, and (ii) increase power compared to the non‐ or semiparametric bounds when the models are close to correct. We demonstrate our results in a clinical trial of depression in Alzheimer’s patients.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.