Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Assessing whether cancer stage is needed to evaluate measures of hospital surgical performance

Early View

  • Author(s): Jessica A. Lavery, Allison Lipitz‐Snyderman, Diane G. Li, Peter B. Bach, Katherine S. Panageas
  • Article first published online: 09 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/jep.13168
  • Read on Online Library
  • Subscribe to Journal

Abstract Rational, aims, and objectives While public reports of hospital‐level surgical quality measures are becoming increasingly common in health care, a comprehensive national assessment of surgical quality across multiple cancer sites has yet to be developed. Fee‐for‐service (FFS) Medicare claims present a potential resource from which to measure outcomes following cancer surgery given the national scope of patients and providers. However, due to the administrative nature of the data, clinical cancer information such as stage is not recorded. Leveraging the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry linked to FFS Medicare claims to analyse outcomes for patients whom we ultimately know stage information, we determined whether Medicare claims are suitable for measuring provider quality following cancer surgery by assessing the extent to which the lack of stage information modifies assessments of provider performance. Methods We identified patients aged 66 and older undergoing cancer surgery between 2011 and 2013 from SEER‐Medicare. We compared the changes in the risk‐standardized rates (RSRs), decile rankings, and c‐statistics with and without risk adjustment for cancer stage for three measures of hospital performance: 30‐day mortality, surgical complications, and unplanned readmissions. Results The RSR changed by at most 11.4% for mortality and by less than 4% for complications and readmissions, indicating that measures of hospital performance were stable with and without adjustment for stage. The relative performance of hospitals was also stable, as demonstrated by fewer than 20% of hospitals changing decile rank. The c‐statistic declined by less than 2% across all measures, indicating that model fit was not substantially worsened without this information. Conclusion These findings support the use of FFS Medicare claims for hospital‐level analyses of short‐term outcomes following cancer surgery. Quality reporting based on these analyses can be used to help patients choose among hospitals and for evaluating policies to improve surgical cancer care.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.