Genetic Epidemiology

Robust meta‐analysis of biobank‐based genome‐wide association studies with unbalanced binary phenotypes

Early View

  • Author(s): Rounak Dey, Jonas B. Nielsen, Lars G. Fritsche, Wei Zhou, Huanhuan Zhu, Cristen J. Willer, Seunggeun Lee
  • Article first published online: 22 Feb 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22197
  • Read on Online Library
  • Subscribe to Journal

Abstract With the availability of large‐scale biobanks, genome‐wide scale phenome‐wide association studies are being instrumental in discovering novel genetic variants associated with clinical phenotypes. As increasing number of such association results from different biobanks become available, methods to meta‐analyse those association results is of great interest. Because the binary phenotypes in biobank‐based studies are mostly unbalanced in their case–control ratios, very few methods can provide well‐calibrated tests for associations. For example, traditional Z‐score‐based meta‐analysis often results in conservative or anticonservative Type I error rates in such unbalanced scenarios. We propose two meta‐analysis strategies that can efficiently combine association results from biobank‐based studies with such unbalanced phenotypes, using the saddlepoint approximation‐based score test method. Our first method involves sharing the overall genotype counts from each study, and the second method involves sharing an approximation of the distribution of the score test statistic from each study using cubic Hermite splines. We compare our proposed methods with a traditional Z‐score‐based meta‐analysis strategy using numerical simulations and real data applications, and demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed methods in terms of Type I error control.

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer

Address:

This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on StatisticsViews.com are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and StatisticsViews.com express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.