British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Early View Articles

Original Articles

An empirical Q‐matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model

  • Author: Wenchao Ma, Jimmy Torre
  • Pub Online: Feb 05, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12156 (p )

Special Issue Papers

IRTree models with ordinal and multidimensional decision nodes for response styles and trait‐based rating responses

  • Author: Thorsten Meiser, Hansjörg Plieninger, Mirka Henninger
  • Pub Online: Feb 12, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12158 (p )

Original Articles

A note on residual M‐distances for identifying aberrant response patterns

  • Author: Christof Schuster, Dirk Lubbe
  • Pub Online: Feb 12, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12161 (p )

Towards end‐to‐end likelihood‐free inference with convolutional neural networks

  • Author: Stefan T. Radev, Ulf K. Mertens, Andreas Voss, Ullrich Köthe
  • Pub Online: Feb 22, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12159 (p )

Special Issue Articles

Individual, situational, and cultural correlates of acquiescent responding: Towards a unified conceptual framework

  • Author: Clemens M. Lechner, Melanie V. Partsch, Daniel Danner, Beatrice Rammstedt
  • Pub Online: Mar 09, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12164 (p )

Original Articles

Dynamic estimation in the extended marginal Rasch model with an application to mathematical computer‐adaptive practice

  • Author: Matthieu J.S. Brinkhuis, Gunter Maris
  • Pub Online: Mar 18, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12157 (p )

When is the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney procedure a test of location? Implications for effect‐size measures

  • Author: Scott Parker, Robert W. Jernigan, Joshua M. Lansky
  • Pub Online: Mar 21, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12162 (p )

Look‐ahead content balancing method in variable‐length computerized classification testing

  • Author: Xiao Li, Jinming Zhang, Hua‐hua Chang
  • Pub Online: Mar 26, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12165 (p )

Special Issue Articles

Assessing item‐feature effects with item response tree models

  • Author: Ulf Böckenholt
  • Pub Online: Mar 26, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12163 (p )

Original Articles

Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement

  • Author: Daniel J. Adams, Daniel M. Bolt, Sien Deng, Stevens S. Smith, Timothy B. Baker
  • Pub Online: Mar 28, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12169 (p )

Special Issue Papers

Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence

  • Author: Ricardo Primi, Daniel Santos, Filip De Fruyt, Oliver P. John
  • Pub Online: Apr 29, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12168 (p )

Original Articles

Clustering preference data in the presence of response‐style bias

  • Author: Mariko Takagishi, Michel Velden, Hiroshi Yadohisa
  • Pub Online: May 02, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12170 (p )

Bayesian generalized structured component analysis

  • Author: Ji Yeh Choi, Heungsun Hwang
  • Pub Online: May 02, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12166 (p )

Hubert's multi‐rater kappa revisited

  • Author: Antonio Martín Andrés, María Álvarez Hernández
  • Pub Online: May 06, 2019
  • DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12167 (p )
Page:   1 2 3 Next

Related Topics

Related Publications

Related Content

Site Footer


This website is provided by John Wiley & Sons Limited, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ (Company No: 00641132, VAT No: 376766987)

Published features on are checked for statistical accuracy by a panel from the European Network for Business and Industrial Statistics (ENBIS)   to whom Wiley and express their gratitude. This panel are: Ron Kenett, David Steinberg, Shirley Coleman, Irena Ograjenšek, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Rainer Göb, Philippe Castagliola, Xavier Tort-Martorell, Bart De Ketelaere, Antonio Pievatolo, Martina Vandebroek, Lance Mitchell, Gilbert Saporta, Helmut Waldl and Stelios Psarakis.