Each week, we select a recently published Open Access article to feature. This week’s article comes from Statistica Neerlandica and discuses the “significance filter” and its influence on overestimation. This article has also been selected as one of Statistica Neerlandica’s Editors’ Choice articles.
The article’s abstract is given below, with the full article available to read here.
, . The significance filter, the winner’s curse and the need to shrink. Statistica Neerlandica. 2021; 1– 15. https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12241
The “significance filter” refers to focusing exclusively on statistically significant results. Since frequentist properties such as unbiasedness and coverage are valid only before the data have been observed, there are no guarantees if we condition on significance. In fact, the significance filter leads to overestimation of the magnitude of the parameter, which has been called the “winner’s curse.” It can also lead to undercoverage of the confidence interval. Moreover, these problems become more severe if the power is low. These issues clearly deserve our attention. They have been studied mostly through empirical observation and simulation, while there are relatively few mathematical results. Here we study them both from the frequentist and the Bayesian perspective. We prove that the relative bias of the magnitude is a decreasing function of the power and that the usual confidence interval undercovers when the power is less than 50%. We conclude that it is important to apply the appropriate amount of shrinkage to counter the winner’s curse.